

The Tax Opinion in Mexico: Is it still a useful tool?

March 25, 2025
Ana Gabriela Vázquez
For years, the tax audit in Mexico has been a key tool for companies to comply with their tax obligations. Under the current provisions of the Federal Tax Code (CFF), certain legal entities have the option of auditing their financial statements for tax purposes. 1 However, is it still a useful tool today, or has it become an unnecessary burden?
Historically, in addition to the fact that tax audits were often mandatory, they also had tangible benefits. One of the main ones was that, in the event of an audit by the Tax Administration Service (SAT), the tax authority would first question the external auditor before addressing the taxpayer directly (commonly known as "the sequential audit"). This provided a margin of defense and greater clarity in the audit, allowing companies to correct omissions without direct and immediate exposure to the authority.
However, recent tax reforms have changed the dynamics of this process. Currently, there have been cases where the SAT exercises its review powers directly over the taxpayer, regardless of the existence of a tax ruling. As a result, the benefit of this intermediary role has practically disappeared.
Furthermore, the tax opinion entails an additional burden in terms of both work and costs. Preparing this document requires a detailed audit of the financial statements, which results in increased auditor fees and a greater investment of time for companies.
If we add the fact that, with the 2022 tax reform, the deadline for submitting the tax opinion was brought forward from July 15 to May 15, this represents an additional challenge, not only for auditors but also for taxpayers, since the time to attend audits has been reduced,
but the workload, no.
While some companies may find value in this process to ensure proper tax compliance, the reality is that, without the regulatory support it once offered, many companies have stopped seeing it as an effective tool.
In conclusion, the tax ruling in Mexico has lost much of its practical usefulness. What was once a strategy to mitigate tax risks and improve transparency is now perceived more as an operational and economic burden that lacks the benefits of previous years. Given this situation, companies must evaluate whether this option is truly worthwhile or if there are more efficient alternatives to ensure tax compliance. At CB Strategy, we offer tax compliance and consulting services (among others), which will give your company the peace of mind of knowing that it is complying with all applicable tax obligations in a timely manner. Come join us!
1 Those that, in the immediately preceding fiscal year, have obtained accumulated income greater than $157,785,270.00, that the value of their assets determined in the terms of the general rules issued for this purpose by the Tax Administration Service, is greater than $124,650,380.00 or that at least three hundred of their workers have provided services to them in each of the months of the immediately preceding fiscal year.
Other News
Supreme Court case law on SAT requirements for tax refunds
Anticipating the 2025 Fiscal Year End: Key to Effective Planning.
SAT limits contracts valid as proof of address
Main aspects of the Third Resolution of Modifications to the RMF 2025

Join our community of experts and receive constant updates.
Stay up to date with the latest tax updates. Enter your email and subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest news and access our experts' opinions and recommendations.